WHITE COAT HUNTER
EVIDENCE LAB v1.2.0
Evidence Lab
Learn Medicine. Question Claims. Follow Evidence.
01 · MEDICAL CLAIM CHECKER
Interrogate the claim, not the person.
Paste a health claim. The checker matches common claim patterns, highlights the evidence standard needed, and shows questions that improve critical appraisal.
⌕Ready to investigateYour result will appear here.
EVIDENCE LADDERMatch the strength of evidence to the claim.
Expert OpinionCase SeriesObservational StudyRandomized TrialSystematic ReviewHierarchy is a starting point, not a substitute for critical appraisal. Risk of bias, directness, precision, consistency, and applicability still matter.
02 · HEALTH SCAM DETECTOR
Spot persuasion tactics before they influence a clinical decision.
Paste promotional copy, a product description, or a health advertisement. The detector flags communication patterns that deserve closer verification.
⚑No text scanned yetRed flags and a verification checklist will appear here.
VERIFY BEFORE YOU TRUST
1. Define the claimWhat exact disease, outcome, dose, and population?
2. Locate the evidenceIs there a traceable study, guideline, or regulatory record?
3. Check the comparisonCompared with placebo, standard care, or nothing?
4. Inspect harmsAre adverse effects, interactions, and uncertainty disclosed?
5. Follow the moneyWho profits, sponsors the claim, or controls the evidence?
6. Look for replicationDo independent sources reproduce the finding?
03 · MEDICAL MYTH CHALLENGE
Myth or fact?
Train yourself to separate familiar claims from defensible evidence.
Score0 / 0
Evidence-Based Medicine
Loading challenge…
Learning pathStudent → Intern → Resident → Evidence Hunter → White Coat Hunter
04 · MEDICAL CRITICAL THINKING LAB
Clinical reasoning under pressure.
Choose a case and work through 12 sequential decisions. Each response is scored for reasoning quality, uncertainty management, and cognitive-bias resistance.
Cases3
Decisions12 / case
ModeLocal, no API
✦Select a caseYour clinical reasoning simulation will appear here.
05 · EVIDENCE APPRAISAL SIMULATOR
Read the study. Interrogate the methods. Decide what the evidence means.
Work through simulated teaching studies designed to train PICO, study design, randomization, blinding, risk of bias, effect size, confidence intervals, NNT/NNH, applicability, and clinical interpretation.
Studies4
Questions10 / study
SourceSimulated
▦Select a studyThe simulated abstract and appraisal questions will appear here.
APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK
1. AskWhat is the PICO or diagnostic/etiologic question?
2. DesignIs the design appropriate for the question?
3. TrustWhere could selection, performance, detection, attrition, or reporting bias enter?
4. MeasureInterpret relative and absolute effects, uncertainty, and heterogeneity.
5. ApplyDoes the study population resemble the patient or setting?
6. DecideIntegrate benefits, harms, certainty, values, and feasibility.
Educational use: This tool teaches evidence appraisal and clinical reasoning. It is not a diagnosis, treatment plan, regulatory ruling, or legal determination that a person, product, or organization is fraudulent.
